Imperialism today - Alex de Jong: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Outline | Outline | ||
Part 1: | '''Part 1:''' | ||
Classical theories – determined by historical moment – end 19th/early 20th century | Classical theories – determined by historical moment – end 19th/early 20th century | ||
competition between advanced capitalist powers – a non-capitalists and non-nation state outside | competition between advanced capitalist powers – a non-capitalists and non-nation state outside | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
Hilfderding, Finance Capital: centralization of capital, monopoly capital | Hilfderding, Finance Capital: centralization of capital, monopoly capital | ||
Imperialism is a policy. | Imperialism is a policy. | ||
Luxemburg, The Accumulation of Capital: capital needs a 'non-capitalist outside' | Luxemburg, The Accumulation of Capital: capital needs a 'non-capitalist outside' | ||
Iimperialism is a capitalist necessity. | Iimperialism is a capitalist necessity. | ||
Lenin and Bukharin (Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism and Imperialism and World Economy) – analysis of the most advanced capitalist countries. Imperialism is a necessity of these powers and characterizes a new phase. | Lenin and Bukharin (Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism and Imperialism and World Economy) – analysis of the most advanced capitalist countries. Imperialism is a necessity of these powers and characterizes a new phase. | ||
Definition of Lenin: (1) concentration of production and capital (2) the merging of bank capital with industrial capital (3) the export of capital (4) international monopolist capitalist associations (5) territorial division of the whole world | Definition of Lenin: (1) concentration of production and capital (2) the merging of bank capital with industrial capital (3) the export of capital (4) international monopolist capitalist associations (5) territorial division of the whole world | ||
“Imperialism is capitalism at that stage of development at which the dominance of monopolies and finance capital is established; in which the export of capital has acquired pronounced importance; in which the division of the world among the international trusts has begun, in which the division of all territories of the globe among the biggest capitalist powers has been completed.” | “Imperialism is capitalism at that stage of development at which the dominance of monopolies and finance capital is established; in which the export of capital has acquired pronounced importance; in which the division of the world among the international trusts has begun, in which the division of all territories of the globe among the biggest capitalist powers has been completed.” | ||
Competition and uneveness between capitalist powers – | |||
vs. | Competition and uneveness between capitalist powers – inevitability of war vs. Kautsky's theory of ultra-imperialism | ||
Kautsky's theory of ultra-imperialism | |||
Problems with Lenin's theory: | Problems with Lenin's theory: | ||
1. relative importance of the export of capital – capital investments in developed countries, not the colonies | 1. relative importance of the export of capital – capital investments in developed countries, not the colonies | ||
2. The theory of the labour aristocracy | 2. The theory of the labour aristocracy | ||
Bukharin: | Bukharin: | ||
1. The tendency towards 'state-capitalism' | 1. The tendency towards 'state-capitalism' | ||
2. This process of 'national organization' takes place in the context of the growing internationalization of capitalism. | |||
2. This process of 'national organization' takes place in the context of the growing internationalization of capitalism. | |||
Capital can only exist as capitals: competition among capitalists. Vertical contradictions: labour – capital, horizontal: capital – capital | Capital can only exist as capitals: competition among capitalists. Vertical contradictions: labour – capital, horizontal: capital – capital | ||
capitalist imperialism is constituted by the intersection of two forms of competition: economic and geopolitical. Territorial logic of states and molecular process of capital. | capitalist imperialism is constituted by the intersection of two forms of competition: economic and geopolitical. Territorial logic of states and molecular process of capital. | ||
capitalist imperialism takes form when geopolitical competition becomes integrated into the process of capital accumulation. This a non-reductionist approach to the question. | capitalist imperialism takes form when geopolitical competition becomes integrated into the process of capital accumulation. This a non-reductionist approach to the question. | ||
Degree of indetermincay: capitalist class not unified and not always sure about its best interests. | Degree of indetermincay: capitalist class not unified and not always sure about its best interests. | ||
Post 1945: 'ostracizing imperialism' – relationship core and periphery – debt as imperialist tool | Post 1945: 'ostracizing imperialism' – relationship core and periphery – debt as imperialist tool | ||
Part 2: | |||
Permanent Revolution vs. Campism | |||
Strategy or Analysis? | |||
Lenin: "uneven development": | Lenin: "uneven development": | ||
1. disparities of levels of economic development in the world of his day (David Harvey, spatial-temporal fix) – entrenched uneveness – benefits of scale | 1. disparities of levels of economic development in the world of his day (David Harvey, spatial-temporal fix) – entrenched uneveness – benefits of scale | ||
2. competition among powers. | 2. competition among powers. | ||
Extension of nation state system | Extension of nation state system | ||
| Line 47: | Line 70: | ||
classical imperialism: 1884 – 1945 | classical imperialism: 1884 – 1945 | ||
American hegemony in the advanced capitalist world: 1945 – 2000? | American hegemony in the advanced capitalist world: 1945 – 2000? | ||
US domination or US leadership? US leadership: US a defender interests international capital | US domination or US leadership? US leadership: US a defender interests international capital | ||
WW I US already a major power. From debtor to creditor – isolationist interregnum – | Specific characteristics US imperialism. | ||
Stages US imperialism, 1898, Monroe Doctrine, WWI, WWII, implosion Soviet Union 'unipolar moment' | |||
WW I US already a major power. | |||
From debtor to creditor – isolationist interregnum – | |||
WW II decisive turning point, | WW II decisive turning point, | ||
Gilbert Achcar: 'feudal paradigm | |||
world hegemony (US need to be percieved as in universal interest of capital) | Gilbert Achcar: 'feudal paradigm', world hegemony (US need to be percieved as in universal interest of capital) | ||
military / political alliances (NATO, US-Japan security treaty) | military / political alliances (NATO, US-Japan security treaty) | ||
US dollar global currency | US dollar global currency | ||
Cold War, Permanent War economy | Cold War, Permanent War economy | ||
Imperial overstretch – Vietnamwar – Breakdown Bretton- | |||
Imperial overstretch – Vietnamwar – Breakdown Bretton-Woodssystem. | |||
Beginning of decline US empire, military and economical | Beginning of decline US empire, military and economical | ||
military Keynseianism - global hegemon – | |||
Gulf Crisis 1991 – New World Order | military Keynseianism - global hegemon – resource wars - Gulf Crisis 1991 – New World Order | ||
Post 9/11 – a new phase of overstretch? | Post 9/11 – a new phase of overstretch? | ||
problems US imperialism, pressure on US military, economic crisis | problems US imperialism, pressure on US military, economic crisis | ||
Revision as of 22:11, 24 November 2013
Outline Part 1:
Classical theories – determined by historical moment – end 19th/early 20th century competition between advanced capitalist powers – a non-capitalists and non-nation state outside
Hilfderding, Finance Capital: centralization of capital, monopoly capital Imperialism is a policy.
Luxemburg, The Accumulation of Capital: capital needs a 'non-capitalist outside'
Iimperialism is a capitalist necessity.
Lenin and Bukharin (Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism and Imperialism and World Economy) – analysis of the most advanced capitalist countries. Imperialism is a necessity of these powers and characterizes a new phase.
Definition of Lenin: (1) concentration of production and capital (2) the merging of bank capital with industrial capital (3) the export of capital (4) international monopolist capitalist associations (5) territorial division of the whole world
“Imperialism is capitalism at that stage of development at which the dominance of monopolies and finance capital is established; in which the export of capital has acquired pronounced importance; in which the division of the world among the international trusts has begun, in which the division of all territories of the globe among the biggest capitalist powers has been completed.”
Competition and uneveness between capitalist powers – inevitability of war vs. Kautsky's theory of ultra-imperialism
Problems with Lenin's theory:
1. relative importance of the export of capital – capital investments in developed countries, not the colonies
2. The theory of the labour aristocracy
Bukharin:
1. The tendency towards 'state-capitalism'
2. This process of 'national organization' takes place in the context of the growing internationalization of capitalism.
Capital can only exist as capitals: competition among capitalists. Vertical contradictions: labour – capital, horizontal: capital – capital
capitalist imperialism is constituted by the intersection of two forms of competition: economic and geopolitical. Territorial logic of states and molecular process of capital.
capitalist imperialism takes form when geopolitical competition becomes integrated into the process of capital accumulation. This a non-reductionist approach to the question.
Degree of indetermincay: capitalist class not unified and not always sure about its best interests.
Post 1945: 'ostracizing imperialism' – relationship core and periphery – debt as imperialist tool
Part 2:
Permanent Revolution vs. Campism
Strategy or Analysis?
Lenin: "uneven development":
1. disparities of levels of economic development in the world of his day (David Harvey, spatial-temporal fix) – entrenched uneveness – benefits of scale
2. competition among powers.
Extension of nation state system
Part 3: US imperialism
classical imperialism: 1884 – 1945
American hegemony in the advanced capitalist world: 1945 – 2000?
US domination or US leadership? US leadership: US a defender interests international capital
Specific characteristics US imperialism.
Stages US imperialism, 1898, Monroe Doctrine, WWI, WWII, implosion Soviet Union 'unipolar moment'
WW I US already a major power.
From debtor to creditor – isolationist interregnum –
WW II decisive turning point,
Gilbert Achcar: 'feudal paradigm', world hegemony (US need to be percieved as in universal interest of capital)
military / political alliances (NATO, US-Japan security treaty)
US dollar global currency
Cold War, Permanent War economy
Imperial overstretch – Vietnamwar – Breakdown Bretton-Woodssystem.
Beginning of decline US empire, military and economical
military Keynseianism - global hegemon – resource wars - Gulf Crisis 1991 – New World Order
Post 9/11 – a new phase of overstretch?
problems US imperialism, pressure on US military, economic crisis
Defeat in Iraq – reorientation under Obama – 'Asian pivot' – dying Empire?
Reading Materials
- David McNally, "Understanding Imperialism: Old and New Dominion", 2005
- Michael Löwy: "The relevance of permanent revolution", 2000
- Gilbert Achcar: "Balance-sheet of U.S. imperialism", 2008
Additional reading: